In Defence Of History: Marxism And The Postmodern Agenda

Are We Now In An Age Of Postmodernity? Even As Some On The Right Have Proclaimed The End Of History Or The Final Triumph Of Capitalism, We Are Told By Some Left Intellectuals That The Modern Epoch Has Ended, That The Enlightenment Project Is Dead, That All The Old Verities And Ideologies Have Lost Their Relevance, That The Old Principles Of Rationality No Longer Apply, And So On. Yet What Is Striking About The Current Diagnosis Of Postmodernity Is That It Has So Much In Common With Older Pronouncements Of Death, Both Radical And Reactionary Versions. What Has Ended, Apparently, Is Not So Much Another, Different Epoch But The Same One All Over Again. In Response, The Best Of TodayS New Intellectuals On The Left Are Returning To Historical Materialism, To Class Analysis. This Collection Reflects That Move, Pinning Postmodernism In Its Place And Time. It Exposes The Erroneous Bases Of Pomo Premises, By Identifying The Real Problems To Which The Current Intellectual Fashions Offer False Or No Solutions. In Doing So, The Contributors Challenge The Limits Imposed On Action And Resistance By Those Who See Liberating New Times In The Contradictions Of Contemporary Capitalism. What Is Being Celebrated In The Postmodern Agenda, Argues Ellen Meiksins Wood, Is The Prosperity Of The Consumerist 1960S Reflected In A Distorting Mirror. The Instability And Economic Polarization Of The 1990S Demand A Solid Critique Of The Conditions Of Capitalism, Not Endless Reexaminations Of Their Meanings This Is The Standard And Goal Of In Defense Of History. A Hard-Hitting CritiqueIn Defense Of History Brings Together Fin