Supreme Court Mein Ramlala (Hindi Edition)

This book describes every minute detail of the marathon 40-day hearing of the Ayodhya dispute in the Supreme Court and the Courts historic verdict. What arguments did each party present on each day of the 40-day hearing? What responses were given, and what comments did each judge make during the hearing? During the 40-day hearing, newspaper headlines focused solely on a few court comments and arguments, while much more transpired during the hearing. Newspaper and TV news lacks information about what transpired during the day-long hearing beyond the specific comments. Many people want to know what transpired throughout the days hearing. This book will provide the answers. The book provides a brief account of the Ayodhya dispute and details the key grounds on which the Allahabad High Courts decision was given. The dispute then reached the Supreme Court and remained pending for eight years. The Supreme Court made two attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation, both of which failed. How did Ram Lalla finally become the owner of the land divided into three parts? You will find the answer to this question in this book. At the end of the book, the 116-page addendum of the judge who gave an anonymous opinion in the Supreme Courts historic decision has been expanded. In which, without revealing his name, a judge, based on facts, stated that the disputed site is the birthplace of Lord Ram. This book has been prepared with all this heard and unheard information. This court was tasked with resolving a dispute whose roots are as old as the very idea of India. The events of this dispute span from the Mughal Empire to the present constitutional rule. The final sentence of the historic decisionthe conclusionis that even before the construction of the mosque, Hindus believed that the birthplace of Lord Ram was the same place where the Babri Masjid stood, and this belief has been confirmed by documents and oral testimony.